A reading that offers several perspectives is more balanced, and a strong argument must consider and argue against counter-arguments. This approach does not use mathematical models, but rather interviews, case studies and analysis of written documents. Knowledge is developed in academia by improving on or disproving previous findings, so you should consider whether the reading has the most up-to-date understanding of the topic.
Are there any flaws in the reasoning?
Some readings will identify their assumptions: This is a sign of a weaker argument. If it is impossible to repeat research, it is also impossible to test it.
Does the logic flow? Some theories or principles only apply in certain situations. Evidence It is essential to consider the quality of the evidence in the reading, as this directly relates to the usefulness of the reading.
When there is more than one way to explain evidence, you must carefully evaluate the plausibility of each explanation. Quantitative research involves measuring quantifying and analysing specific numerical or statistical data.
Are there any claims that seem unusual or extraordinary? Does every point follow on from the last point? Qualitative research involves the examination, analysis, and interpretation of observations or accounts of events in order to identify themes, underlying meanings, and patterns.
Balance In order to read critically you have to consider whether the argument is appropriately balanced, looking at the issue or problem from relevant perspectives. The wider the range or sample size of research, the more the findings can be generalised.
If someone else conducted similar research using these methods, would they be likely to have a similar result? Is the evidence convincing? Is the reading trying to convince you of something? Is each term that has been used properly defined?
It is impossible for a reading to be completely balanced, because a conclusion must ultimately be drawn, but some readings are more biased than others.
Does the evidence agree with your own understanding of the topic? If a theory is applied outside of those situations, it may weaken the argument. Does the evidence agree with other sources? Upper Saddle River, NJ: Opinions can easily be contradicted by an alternative opinion.consumer support Smart Thinking Skills For Critical Understanding And Writing 2nd Edition ePub comparability suggestions and comments of equipment you can use with your Smart Thinking Skills For Critical Understanding And Writing 2nd Edition pdf etc.
Smart Thinking: Skills for Critical Understanding and Writing by Matthew Allen - PDF Drive smart thinking skills for critical understanding and writin secondg edition matthew allen oxford university press. Smart thinking skills for critical understanding and writing - Quick and trustworthy writings from industry leading company.
Let specialists do their work: order the required essay here and expect for the best score leave behind those sleepless nights writing your coursework with our academic writing assistance.
Get this from a library! Smart thinking: skills for critical understanding and writing. [Matthew Allen].
Smart Thinking: Skills for Critical Understanding and Writing 2E is a practical step-by-step guide to improving skills in analysis, critical thinking, and the effective communication of arguments and explanations. The book combines an accessible and straightforward style, with a strong foundation of knowledge.
The text treats reasoning as an aspect of. Smart Thinking: Skills for Critical Understanding and Writing 2E is a practical step-by-step guide to improving skills in analysis, critical thinking, and the effective communication of arguments and explanations.
The book combines an accessible and straightforward style, with a strong foundation of /5.Download