I like that Carson kept a calm clean point of view and offered valid questions that were easy to read and understand and rendered these problems capable of being solved with some critical thinking and cooperation.
Carson opens this argumentative essay with an analytical opening. The parallel structure of this sentence shows the progression of how one action by man the use of nuclear bombs has a rippling effect to humans who were not even present when the bomb exploded. Carson presents the argument suggesting perhaps human beings would not want to spray pesticides such as DDT around homes, children, and offices without ascertaining any adverse dangers and risks associated with these pesticides.
Perhaps this essay also was targeted towards certain companies at the time such as Dupont for example although Carson made it important to try and keep it acedemic in this fashion. Retrieved September 22, How could intelligent beings seek to control a few unwanted species by a method that contaminated the entire environment and brought the threat of disease and death even to their own kind?
This showed enormous amounts of bravery and strength on her part as she was experiencing health problems of her own at the time of her speech to the Supreme Court in Carson reconciles and attempts to persuade the public to consider the idea that DDT, which in the s and 60s was one of the many chemical pesticides being manufactured and sold to individuals for use on their home lawns, were indeed unsafe for applications on lawns and around children.
First, she offers a vision of the present and future that is cramped, desperate, and precarious — an exercise in survival — in contrast to a past lived fully at peace with nature. Insects accel at adapting genetically and Carson feared that insects like mosquitos, among others types, may surpass us in their superior ability to overcome genetic challenges by bouncing back in more numerous quantities contributing to the ongoing survival of their species regardless of the genetic chemicals.
An example of the severity of this issue is when Rachel Carson was allowed to address the Supreme Court on this issue.
She urges caution because alarmingly little is known about their effects, and because what we do know — that they move through and are changed by the environment in unpredictable ways, and that they cause a harmful ripple effect in the interconnected web of life — means that they could pose a dire threat to humans.
Although there are naturally occurring dangers from small amounts of radiation or chemical exposure, life has created a careful and resilient balance over the course of millennia in defense against them.
Active Themes One of the scariest aspects of this pollution is the speed with which it has taken hold.
The Obligation to Endure. On behalf of the concerned public, she then questions the regulators responsible for creating these conditions, and urges caution and a return to the past. Active Themes In addition to the problem of regulation of pesticides, there is a lack of research into the negative consequences of these materials.
Strontium 90, released through nuclear explosions into the air, comes to earth in rain or drifts down as fallout, lodges in soil, enters the grass or corn or wheat drown there, and in no time takes up its abode in the bones of human beings, there to remain until his death.
Industry officials dominate discussion of the topic, silencing protests that urge caution and issuing false assurances of safety.
Carson suggests genetic level tampering of the codes of insects could render us homo sapiens very susceptible to certain types of unwanted diseases. Many of the changes Carson describes have taken place over just the previous twenty-five years — which is a mere moment in geological time.
Carson presents the problem nicely in the opening paragraph and states her claim as a practical approach to stop or decrease the amount of the spraying of DDT pesticides in combined efforts to stop the super races of insects like mosquitoes for example from becoming immune.
Carson appeals to the arousal of the basic emotions such as the arousal of fear in the public, but not in such a way that would overly scare someone and turn them off due to excessiveness. Carson addresses these understandable concerns utilizing logical, emotional, and ethical appeal. One species of pest can flourish explosively when farmers plant a field composed exclusively of a single crop as opposed to the time honored tradition of planting a field with multiple cropsand that single crop is then vulnerable to any attack or disease because of its lack of diversity.
We are told by their supporters that these pesticides are necessary for farm production, but in fact there is a problem of food overproduction: Carson opens this argumentative essay with an analytical opening.
Carson addresses these understandable concerns utilizing logical, emotional, and ethical appeal. She wants to educate her readers about the realities of the pest issue, while introducing an understanding that pesticides only worsen a problem that could be solved by natural means, which she will discuss in later chapters.
The public must actively demand to know the facts about pesticide use before continuing down its current path of action. Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues.
We can write a custom essay According to Your Specific Requirements. Carson then gives very specific details of chemicals that are used in agriculture to limit pests, but, because of our agricultural system, farmers have to use more and more pesticides to continue to see positive results.
In my opinion Rachel Carson wrote a very wonderful and balanced essay that was easy to read, appealed to everyone such as men, patient readers, humans, and women as well that may have been interested.
Here, Carson presses a few of her key themes. Including this support for her thesis Carson argues mosquitoes becoming immune to the man-made vaccines presently available would inarguably have serious, detrimental and adverse negative impacts upon the effectiveness of the survival of our own species by Rachel Carson: Carson tests the values of her paper when she warrants the arguer writing Carsoncha.
She argues that this combat against nature creates a useless spiral of violence, destroying many species that were not the initial target of pesticide spraying and spreading chemicals that accumulate dangerously in organic tissues.
If insects were suddenly able to adapt to chemicals this would mean they would also adapt to vaccines that protect us. Carson presents the argument suggesting perhaps human beings would not want to spray pesticides such as DDT around homes, children, and offices without ascertaining any adverse dangers and risks associated with these pesticides.
Instead of living in harmony with nature, humans have chosen to take up arms against it.Analyzing Rachel Carson’s “the Obligation to Endure” Essay Analyzing Rachel Carson’s “The Obligation to Endure ” In her essay “The Obligation to Endure ”, Rachel Carson alerts the public to the dangers of modern industrial pollution.
In her essay “The Obligation to Endure”, Rachel Carson alerts the public to the dangers of modern industrial pollution. She writes about the harmful consequences of lethal materials being released into the environment. In the essay "The Obligation to Endure" by Rachel Carson, she strongly expresses the evidence of the damage caused by indiscriminate use of insecticides and the danger of destruction to the earth's balance.
Rachel Carson: “THE OBLIGATION TO ENDURE”. 4 by keeping it simple yet informative and persuasive and stays away from being caught in a fallacy which makes it readable and proves effective in validlating her point of view. A Rhetoric Analysis of: “The Obligation to Endure” By Rachel Carson Essay Sample.
Abstract The following involves the second chapter of Carson’s book, Silent Spring that was written in Get an answer for 'In Rachel Carson's essay "The Obligation to Endure," why does Carson make references to Elton's The Ecology of Invasions as well as to Paul Shepard and Neely Turner?